HomeCalculatorsMathComplex NumbersEuler Form Calculator
Math calculator

Euler Form Calculator

Convert rectangular or polar complex numbers into Euler form with angles in degrees. Explore the Argand diagram, worked examples and numerical limits.

Instant result
Result
—

Enter values to calculate.

Inputs—
Mode—
Formula—
Trust summary CVP VERIFIED · CVP protocol 1.0.0-proposed · Core assurance · all published modes
Input interpretation
Enter values to calculate.
Result
—
Verified scope
all published modes
Assurance
Core
Declared partition coverage
PASS · 12/12 declared partitions (add, sub, mul, div, rect-to-polar, polar-to-rect, conjugate, modulus, power, root, euler, invalid-domain) · Matrix
Known limitations
  • Core CVP does not include live graph, viewport, or pointer interaction.
Model
Euler / cis form of one complex number, and an engine-linked Argand figure.
Scope
atan2 argument in degrees
Verification
Engine tested · Source checked · v1.3.0 · CVP VERIFIED · CVP protocol 1.0.0-proposed · Core assurance · all published modes· View Manifest · CVP overview · Specification
Versions
Calculation 1.3.0 · CVP protocol 1.0.0-proposed · Evidence 2026-10-29.math-uuce-fields-v1
Verification revision
2026-10-29.math-uuce-fields-v1 · 3/3 property · digest e0f5f79d4366
Legacy regression
18/18 tests · Production surface contract 5/5
Trust layers
Verification VERIFIED · Production CURRENT · Overall CVP state: VERIFIED under CVP 1.0.0-proposed
Reference
O1 model · O2 expected_values · O2 numerical_behavior
Interfaces
PASS · UI (SSR) / REST / MCP — ui-ssr is query-result HTML, not a live browser session. Error-path engine·REST·MCP 1/1 (status, code, calculation_version). SSR compared on URL-canonical requested calculations; empty query is idle (not an error) and JSON-typed object/array inputs are REST/MCP-only.
Supplemental domain review
Not performed
Named expert review
Not performed
CVP suite
643/643 golden · 5/5 CVP boundary · 9/9 invalid · 3/3 property · 4/4 metamorphic · 5/5 cross-interface · 2/2 cross-calculator · 5/5 CVP contract · Manifest
Evidence
6 legacy golden · 4 legacy boundary · legacy regression suite · 643/643 oracle-backed golden · 9/9 invalid · Artifact integrity PASS
This calculator CURRENT · Public schema 1.3.0 matches · Semantic contract ✓ · Production attested · Public/cache ✓ · Origin ✓
Semantic contract
PASS
Full verification

Manifest identity, reference classes, interfaces, suite, and production records.

Formulas

Core equations used by this calculator.

Eulerz = r e^{iθ}
Cise^{iθ} = cos θ + i sin θ
Identitye^{iπ} = −1
iθ in degrees (−180°, 180°]. r ≥ 0. Polar → Euler with r=1, θ=180° is Euler’s identity. Not a second complex engine. Not contour integrals.

How to use

1

Choose rect or polar

Rect uses re and im. Polar uses r and θ. Default polar 1 ∠ 180° is −1.

2

Read r e^{iθ}

Arithmetic stays on /calc/math/complex-number. The Argand figure updates with z.

Example calculations

Common configurations with formula and result.

ϟ

Euler identity

r=1 θ=180°

e^{iπ} = −1
−1
ϟ

i

0+1i

e^{i 90°}
1 e^{i 90°}

Euler Form calculator specification

Version 1.3.0 · Engine tested

Calculation status

Review policy · Evidence

Definition
z = r e^{iθ} with θ in degrees, atan2 convention. This page is mode=euler on math.complex. Polar conversion is /complex-polar. Not complex analysis.
What it calculates
Euler / cis form of one complex number, and an engine-linked Argand figure.
Inputs
  • from?
  • re?
  • im?
  • r?
  • arg_deg?
Outputs
  • re
  • im
  • r
  • arg_deg
  • euler
  • cis
Formula
z = r e^{iθ}
Assumptions
  • atan2 argument in degrees
  • r ≥ 0
  • Not a CAS
  • Not complex analysis
Units
  • dimensionless
  • degrees
Boundary conditions
  • r < 0 → VALUE_MUST_BE_NON_NEGATIVE
  • unknown mode (including log) → INVALID_MODE
Example
from=polar r=1 arg_deg=180 → −1
Validation cases

2 published on this page · 18/18 tests · Production surface contract 5/5 · View evidence

  • from=polar r=1 arg_deg=180 → re=-1 im=0
  • re=0 im=1 → r=1 arg_deg=90
Sources
Calculation version
1.3.0

Background

Interpretation and common distinctions.

What does this euler form calculator compute?

z = r e^{iθ} with θ in degrees, atan2 convention.

The published formula or method is z = r e^{iθ}. The following references support the stated mathematics or method:

Which inputs and limits should you check?

Keep Cartesian and polar representations consistent. Angle units and the selected root or power branch affect the interpretation of a complex result.

The worked example uses r=1 θ=180° with e^{iπ} = −1. Compare it with the Example calculations and the complete result for the same inputs.

How can you verify and cite this result?

CalculatorX is responsible for this page. The mathematical references above explain the model; implementation checks and their scope are documented separately in the math.complex v1.3.0 Evidence and capability contract. Read the displayed verification and production state together with the specification's numerical limits.

Use the clean calculator URL to cite the tool. A shared input link identifies a particular calculation. Content updates, numerical verification, and domain reviews have separate dates and scopes.

Numerical policy and branch conventions

All angles use degrees. The principal argument lies in (−180°,180°]; a negative real number uses +180°, including a signed zero imaginary part. At the origin, the displayed argument0° is a convention, not a defined mathematical direction. Nonzero inputs and output components/modulus must be finite normal binary64 values (at least2⁻¹⁰²² in magnitude); scaling or intermediate range loss returns NUMERIC_RANGE with rescaling advice. Nonzero decimal text that converts to zero is rejected as NUMERIC_UNDERFLOW.

Power accepts integer |n|≤1000, including negative powers of nonzero numbers;0⁰ is undefined. Roots accept integer2≤n≤64 and return every distinct root in k order; zero has one distinct root. Principal root is k=0 with the argument convention above. Integer powers use scaled rectangular arithmetic; division scales both operands to avoid squared-denominator overflow/underflow. Polar angles are reduced modulo360° before trigonometry, with exact cardinal directions.

The verification budget is2e−11 times the result modulus for rectangular coordinates and modulus, and2e−9 degrees for argument on well-conditioned examples. Components near cancellation may have large relative error even with small vector error. Direction is sensitive near zero and discontinuous at the negative real axis; rounded angles alone cannot reconstruct tiny components. Values remain binary64 approximations, not arbitrary precision or symbolic results.

Interactive calculation runs in your browser. Opening a shared URL sends its query to the site for server rendering; REST/MCP also receive their inputs. The diagram shows all roots; the text work list and CSV/JSON export retain all64 possible roots without truncation.

Frequently asked questions

Key distinctions behind the calculation.

Is this a second complex engine?

No. It is mode=euler on math.complex, the same engine as /calc/math/complex-number.

Is this complex analysis?

No. It writes Euler form. Poles, residues, and contour integrals stay out of scope.